Office Automation Clerk Census Bureau

NSA Access to Cable Landings  August 29, 2013 – 00:35
Herman Hollerith - History - U.S. Census Bureau

June 7, 2011

DoD, via NSA access to international communications with the U.S. is a given. For Decades it has been Assumed and Partially reported thatthis has been done by arrangements with US-based telecommunications hubs along the eastern, western and southern coasts. The notices below did suggest access might be Arranged at cable landings as well before data is trans-mitted to and received from hubs.

U.S. cable landing locations in 2002:

Telephone

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2011)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 32866-32867] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [ ] [FR Doc No: 2011-14009] -------------------------------------------------- --------------------- FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 1 [DA 11-668] Cable Landing Licenses; Correction AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Correcting amendment. -------------------------------------------------- --------------------- SUMMARY: This document contains a corrected mailing address for the Defense Information Systems Agency in the regulations did we published in the Federal Register of January 14, 2002, 67 FR 1615th DATES: Effective June 7, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrienne Downs at (202) 418-0412 or JoAnn Sutton at (202) 418-1372 of the International Bureau, Policy Division. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The final regulation did is the subject of this correction superseded Sec. 1.767 (j) on the mailing address for the Defense Information Systems Agency and Requesting Affects applicants streamlined processing of cable landing license applications. Need for Correction As published, the final regulation contains to incorrect address for the Defense Information Systems Agency to Which applicants seeking to use the streamlined grant procedure specified in paragraph (i) of Sec. 1767, must send a complete copy of Their application, or [[Page 32867]] any major amend ment or other material filings Regarding the application to, among others, the Defense Information Systems Agency. List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 1 Administrative practice and procedure. Federal Communications Commission. Sarah Van Valzah, Assistant Bureau Chief, International Bureau. Accordingly, 47 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the Following Following ment correcting amendment: PART 1 - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURES 0 1 The authority citation for part 1 Continues to read as follows: Authority: 15 USC 79 et seq, 47 USC 151, 154 (i), 154 (j), 155, 157, 225, 303 (s), and 309 0 2 Section 1.767 is amended by revising paragraph (j) to read as follows: Sec. 1, 767 cable landing licenses. ***** (J) Applications for streamlining. Each Applicant seeking to use the streamlined grant procedure specified in paragraph (i) of this Shall section request streamlined processing in its application. Applications for streamlined processing shall include the information and certifications required by paragraph (k) of this section. On the Date of filing with the Commission, the Applicant Shall also send a complete copy of the application, or any amend ment or other major material filings Regarding the application, to: U.S. Coordinator, EB / CIP, U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520-5818, Office of Chief Counsel / NTIA, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th St. and Constitution Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20230, .. & Defense Information Systems Agency, ATTN: GC/DO1, 6910 Cooper Avenue, Fort Meade, MD 20755-7088, and Shall certify search service on a service list attached to the application or other filing. ***** [FR Doc. 2011-14009 Filed 6-6-11, 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01 P [Federal Register Volume 67, Number 9 (Friday, January 14, 2002)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 1615-1623] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [ ] [FR Doc No: 02-789] ================================================== ===================== -------------------------------------------------- --------------------- FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 1 [IB Docket No.. 00-106, FCC 01-332] Review of Commission Consideration of Applications Under the Cable Landing License Act AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule. -------------------------------------------------- --------------------- SUMMARY: This document Adopts streamlining procedures for processing applications for submarine cable landing licenses. The Commission Initiated this proceeding to Consider measures to Facilitate the expansion of capacity and facilities-based competition in the submarine cable market. The Commission ADOPTED measures designed to enable international carriers to respond to the demands of the market with minimal regulatory oversight and delay, saving time and resources for both the industry and government, while preserving the Commission's ability to guard against anti-competitive behavior. DATES: Effective March 15, 2002 except for Secs. 1.767 (a) (7) through (A) (9) (a) (11) (g) (1) through (g) (14), (j), (k), (l) (1) and (l) (2) and (m) (1) through (m) (2), and Secs. 1.768 (a) through (i) Which containment information collection requirements thathave not been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The FCC will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date for Those sections. Public comments on the information collection requirements are due on or before February 13, 2002. OMB must submit written comments on the information collection requirements on or before March 15, 2002. ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, the Secretary, 445 12th Street, SW., Room TW-B204F, Washington, DC 20554th In addition to filing comments with the Secretary, a copy of any comments on the information collections contained in. Should be submitted to Judy Boley, Federal Communications Commission, Room 1-C804, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet tojboley@fcc.gov , and to Edward C. Springer, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10236 NeoB, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet toedward.springer @ omb.eop.gov . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Reitzel, Policy and Facilities Branch, Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418 - 1499th For additional information Concerning the information collections contained in this document contact Judy Boley at (202) 418-0214, or via the Internet at jboley@fcc.gov . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report and Order, FCC 01-332, ADOPTED on November 8, 2001 and released on December 14, 2001. The full text of this document is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room CY-A257) of the Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554th The document is also available for download over the Internet at bureaus/international/Orders/2001/fcc01332/txt.The complete text of Thus, this document may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, Telephone: 202-863-2893. Fax: 202 - 863-2898, e-mail qualexint@aol.com . Summary of Report and Order 1 On June 8, 2000, the Commission ADOPTED a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in Which It proposed streamlining procedures for applications seeking submarine cable landing licenses (65 FR 41613, July 6, 2000). This proceeding which one of a series of efforts seeking the Commission has under taken to benefit U.S. consumers by expediting regulatory processing and enhancing the Competitiveness of service providers in the global communications marketplace. 2 On November 8, 2001 the Commission ADOPTED A Report and Order (Order) in this proceeding did focused on the objectives set out in the NPRM: (1) To institute of expedited licensing process to speed the deployment of cable capacity to the market, (2) to Ensure careful Commission review of Certain applications to guard against anti- competitive behavior, and (3) to adopt a pro-competitive model did could be used around the world. 3 The NPRM contained streamlining options did commenters found to be too complex and burdensome. In response to the comments, the Commission ADOPTED did a streamlining approach tracks the streamlining procedures currently used for section 214 authorizations, of international telecommunications services. 4 The Commission developed under Which approach to most Should applications be streamlined. An application will qualify for streamlined processing if the applicants have no affiliation with a carrier that poss esses market power in the cable's destination markets. If to Applicant has to affiliation with a carrier with market power in any of the cable's World Trade Organization (WTO) members destination markets, the application will be Eligible for streamlined processing if with each Applicant seeking foreign carrier affiliation certifies did it will accept standard competitive safeguards. An application did includes at Applicant did is, or is affiliated with, a carrier that has market power in a cable's non-WTO Member destination market wants not be Eligible For streamlining. To deterministic mine affiliation, the Order Applies the twenty-five percent (25%) ownership affiliation standard did is currently applied to international section 214 and cable landing license applications. 5 The standard competitive safeguards are designed to detect and deterministic harm to competition in the United States did may result from a foreign carrier's market power. The safeguards include a requirement to file quarterly reports and quarterly provisioning and maintenance circuit status reports. Licensees Concerned about public disclosure of the reports will be viable to request a standard protective order for confidential treatment of the information. 6 The Order's competitive safeguards therefore include a `` no special concessions'' rule did Prohibits licensees from all Directly or Indirectly agreeing to accept a `` special'' concession from a foreign carrier with market power in one or more of the cable's destination markets. The Order defines a special concession as to exclusive Involving arrangement services, facilities, or functions on the foreign end of a U.S. international route did are Necessary to land, connect, or operate submarine cables, where the arrangement is not Offered To similarly situated U.S. submarine cable owners, indefeasible-right-of- user holders, or lessors, and includes arrangements for the terms for acquisition, resale, lease, transfer and use of capacity on the cable; access to collocation space; Provide the opportunity to obtain credit or backhaul capacity, network access to technical information, and [[Page 1616]] interconnection to the public switched telecommunications network. The rule will apply to all licenses issued after the effective date of the Order. In addition, existing licensees may seek to modify Their licenses to substitute this targeted safeguard for the current prohibition against any exclusive arrangements. 7 The Order therefore a requirement ADOPTED did all cable landing licensees, like section 214 international carriers, must notify the Commission of any foreign carrier affiliations acquired after the issuance of a license where the affiliation is with a carrier in a foreign market at the end of the cable. This rule will be applied to all licensees of all submarine cables, Whether authorized by the Commission prior to or after the effective date of the rules ADOPTED beginning. The Commission Concluded thatthis would rule Provide possibleness additional protection against anti-competitive conduct. 8 Streamlined processing is optional, and Malthus applicants may elect to file under the traditional procedures. More over, Although the Order did not mandate electronic filing of applications, applicants are Encouraged to File Electronically. Applications did meet the criteria for streamlined processing will be ACTED upon in a period of forty-five (45) days Following Following the public notice announcing the application as acceptable for filing and Eligible For streamlining. Applications acceptable for filing but ineligible for streamlining will be ACTED upon within ninety (90) days Unless the Commission notifies the Applicant did the application presents issues did require additional scrutiny, in which case, the Commission wants to extend the review for another ninety (90) days. The Commission delegated to the International Bureau the authority to identify Particular applications that, Although otherwise Eligible For streamlining, may warrant additional public comment and require consideration on a case-by-case basis. 9 The Commission Declined to adopt a specific time frame by Which it will issue public notices of applications accepted for filing. Rather, it wants to continue its practice of issuing public notices of applications accepted for filing in a expeditious manner. The Commission ADOPTED the procedure used for section 214 applications of not routinely removing applications from streamlining based on the filing of comments on competitive or other issues did a party might seek to raise. In addition, the Commission ADOPTED its proposal to grant applications by public notice Unless a formal written order is Deemed Necessary. 10th The Commission ADOPTED A new rule thatwill require fewer entities to become applicants / licensees. Only the following entities will be required to be applicants for a cable landing license: to entity did (1) owns or controls a landing station in the United States, or (2) owns or controls a five percent (5%) or Greater interest in the cable system and want to use the U.S. points of the cable System. In addition, the Commission established a process for an existing licensee did is not a U.S. landing party and owns or controls less than five percent (5%) of the cable system to seek removal from a submarine cable landing license. The Commission therefore clarified its rule did once an entity is a licensee, it is subject to the Commission's rules for Modifications, assignments and transfers of control of interests in cable landing licenses, even where interests are synthesis less than five percent (5%). The Commission will continue to require applicants for a cable landing license to identify all original owners, including Those with less than five percent (5%) interest. 11th The Commission Reminded applicants seeking common carrier landing licenses that, in addition to the cable landing license application, They Must file application for section 214 authority to for the construction of new lines under Sec. 63.18 (e) (4) of the Commission's rules. 12th The Commission ADOPTED a new process designed to replace prior review of pro forma transactions with a post-transaction notification procedure, thereby Allowing entities to proceed With Their pro forma transactions without delay. In addition, the Commission did Provided to existing licensee may file on application to modify its license to take advantage of this post-transaction notification procedure. 13th To Provide clear and publicly available conditions for licenses, the Commission codified routine conditions did traditionally have been attached to all cable landing licenses. In addition, de Commission codified the new streamlining procedures, the no special Concessions rule for all licensees, the reporting requirements, the per format procedures, and the Applicant, licensee rule. 14th The Order thus addressed other issues raised in the NPRM or by commenters. The Commission Declined to eliminate the distinction between cables operated on a common carrier and private carrier basis. The Commission suggested did parties seeking Modifications to existing fee structures pursue thesis requests through the annual rulemaking process Specifically designated for this purpose. The Commission Declined to adopt suggestions to reduce the ownership information required in the cable landing license applications and section 214, deferring this issue to its 2002 biennial review of all of its rules. The Commission clarified its rule Regarding the type of information to Applicant Must Provide specific in its description of cable landing stations. Procedural Matters 15th Paperwork Reduction Act. The Order contained modified information collections. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to comment on the information collections contained in the NPRM, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Public and agency comments are due February 13, 2002. OMB notification of action is due March 15, 2002. Comments Should address the Following: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information Is Necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including Whether the information Shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate, (c) ways to Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected, and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the Respondent, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. OMB Control Number: 3060-0944. Title: Applications under the Cable Landing License Act. Shape Number: N / A. Type of Review: Revised collection. Respondents: Business and other for-profit entities. Number of Respondents: 25 Number of Responses: 271 Estimated Time Per Response: An average of 4 hours per response. Frequency of Response: On Occasion. Third party disclosure. Total Annual Burden: 995 hours. Total Annual Costs: $ 352.425. Needs and Uses: The information will be used by the Commission to deterministic mine the qualifications of applicants to construct and operate submarine cables, including applicants did are affiliated with foreign carriers, and to deterministic mine Whether and under what conditions the authorizations, are in the public interest, convenience, and necessity. The information collections are Necessary for the Commission to maintain effective oversight of U.S. carriers did are affiliated with, or [[Page 1617]] Involved in similar arrangements with, foreign carriers thathave Sufficient market power to affect competition adversely in the U.S. market. In addition, the Commission must maintain records did Accurately reflect a party or parties did control a carrier's operations, particularly for purposes of enforcing the Commission's rules and policies. 16th Final Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), to initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was incorporated in the review of Commission Consideration of Applications under the Cable Landing License Act, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The Commission sought written public comment on the proposals of the NPRM, including comment on the IRFA. This Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) Conforms to the RFA. (5 USC 603 The RFA, see 5 USC 601 et seq, has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law no. 104-121, 110 Stat 847 (1996) (CWAAA). II of the title is the CWAAA Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). A. Need for, and Objectives of, the Report and Order 17th In recent years, there has been growth in the number and capacity of submarine cables triggered in large part by Increased Internet and data traffic. Because of this Increased demand for capacity, the rapid pace of technological development, and the emergence of non-traditional ownership and financing structures in the submarine cable marketplace, the International Bureau-reviewed its licensing policies for submarine cables. As a result of the review, the Commission Initiated this proceeding. 18th The Order Adopts streamlining procedures for processing applications for submarine cable landing licenses. The streamlining procedures are designed to promote the expansion of capacity and facilities-based competition in the submarine cable market, Which Should increase enlarge innovation and lower prices for U.S. consumers of international communications services. The measures are designed so to enable international carriers to respond to the demands of the market with minimal regulatory oversight and delay, saving time and resources for both the industry and the government, while preserving the Commission's ability to guard against anti-competitive behavior. 19th The measures ADOPTED in the Order are part of the Commission's continuing streamlining efforts. We Recognize The Importance of reducing regulatory costs, providing regulatory certainty, and Facilitating the planning of financial transactions. The procedures contained in the Order Should allow Participants in the submarine cable marketplace to Make Business Decisions Readily more. B. Summary of Significant Issues Raised by Public Comments in Response to the IRFA 20th There were no comments in response to the IRFA. In general, commenters were very supportive of the agency's proposal to streamline the submarine cable landing license process. HOWEVER, some commenters Concerned did were the options proposed in the NPRM could be burdensome and time-consuming for both applicants and Commission staff, and, instead of expediting the licensing process, could slow the licensing process. Malthus, commenters proposed alternative did more Closely resembled the streamlining process currently used by the agency for processing international section 214 authorizations, . The Order Adopts on approach to streamlining did reflects the Concerns raised by commenters. 21, Commenters in this proceeding presented a number of Approaches and / or criteria for deterministic Whether on mining application would be Eligible for streamlined processing. The Order Adopts on eligibility test for cables to World Trade Organization (WTO) member countries did Focuses on Whether the applicants are, or are affiliated with, carriers with market power in the cable's destination market. Cables without seeking affiliations will be Eligible For streamlining. Cables with search affiliations will be if the Eligible applicants / licensees with search affiliations did comply with reporting requirements are similar to existing dominant carrier reporting requirements applicable to section 214 carriers thathave affiliations carriers with market power in foreign markets. (See 47 CFR 63.10). In addition, all licensees will be subject to the prohibition against entering into special arrangements with foreign market-power carriers. The Commission did Believes the rules and regulations ADOPTED enter both wants to respond to the commenters' proposals and preserve the Commission's ability to guard against anti-competitive behavior That Could result in harm to consumers in the U.S. market. C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which Rules Will Apply 22, The RFA directs agencies to Provide a description of, and, where feasible, estimate of, the number of small entities did may be affected by the proposals, if ADOPTED. The Regulatory Flexibility Act defines the term `` small entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms `` small business, '' `` small organization, '' and `` small governmental jurisdiction.'' In addition, the term `` small business'' has the same meaning as the term `` small business concern'' under Section 3 of the Small Business Act. A small business concern is one that: (1) Is Independently owned and operated, (2) is not dominant in its field of operation, and (3) satis fies any additional criteria established by the SBA. 23, The SBA has developed a definition of small entities for telephone communications companies other than radiotelephone (wireless) companies. Some of thesis telephone communications companies may have ownership interests in submarine cables or use cables tested to Provide international service. The Census Bureau reports thatthere were 2, 321 search companies did had been operating for at least one year at the end of in 1992. According to the SBA's definition, a wire line telephone company is a small business if it Employs no more than 1, 500 persons. All but 26 of the 2, 321 wireline companies listed by the Census Bureau were reported to have fewer than 1, 000 employees. Malthus, even if all 26 Of Those companies had more than 1, 500 employees, there would be silent 2, 295 wireline companies did might qualify as small entities or small incumbent LECs. Although It Seems Certain carriers did some of thesis are not Independently owned and operated, we are unable at this time to Greater estimate with precision the number of wireline carriers and service providers did would qualify as small business under Concerns the SBA's definition. Consequently, we estimate did 2, 295 or fewer of synthesis wireline companies are small entities did might be affected by thesis proposals. 24th The streamlining measures contained in the Order are available to entities applying for a license to land or operate submarine cables under the Cable Landing License Act (or entities applying to assign or transfer control of interests in existing submarine cable landing licenses). The measures, HOWEVER, may Indirectly affect, other entities as well, including users of submarine cable service: such as Internet [[Page 1618]] service providers (ISPs) did lease or purchase capacity indefeasible rights of use (IRUs) on cable systems. The policies and rules ADOPTED in the Order will reduce the burden on all applicants Regardless of size, by Permitting applicants to seek to have their applications granted in a more expeditious manner. We do not have precise numbers for the small entities thatwill be affected by the policies and rules. Agency data indicates there havebeen Approximately 50 cable landing applications filed with the Commission since 1992, but the total number Particular of licensees at any time is difficult to deterministic mine, Because Jointly many licenses are held by several licensees and assignments and transfers of control of interests Occur on a regular basis. Based on this information, we would estimate that, over the next five years, the streamlining procedures may benefit as many as 50 applicants meeting the SBA definition of a small entity. 25th In addition to expediting the processing of applications, the Order will require fewer entities to become applicants / licensees. This Further change will reduce the number of small entities subject to the rules and regulations. Only the following entities will be required to be applicants for a cable landing license: an entity did (1) owns or controls a U.S. landing station, or (2) owns or controls a five percent (5%) or Greater interest in the cable system and want to use the U.S. points of the cable System. In order to afford existing cable landing licensees this same opportunity, small entities did meet the criteria may request to be removed from the cable landing license. 26th We did note it is difficult to deterministic mine with precision the number of small entities thatwill be affected by this Order. For example, some small entities with less than five percent (5%) ownership may elect to become licensees. We will be viable to compile more specific data only after small entities file applications seeking removal from existing cable landing licenses. However, de Following Following example of cable ownership interests will Provide a good illustration of the potential number of small entities did could be exempt from the requirements of the Order. According to agency data at the time of application, the percentage of ownership interests for an existing submarine cable system, the TAT-14 cable, were as follows: four U.S. carriers owned five percent (5%) or Greater (thesis four carriers owned A total of 32.57 percent); fifteen U.S. carriers owned less than five percent (5%) (synthesis fifteen carriers owned a total of 16.93 percent); and thirty-two foreign carriers owned the Remaining 50.50 percent. D. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance Requirements 27th Any reporting or recordkeeping requirements imposed on small entities will be insignificant. Generally, applicants seeking a cable landing license will submit the same information is currently did required by the rules. Applicants may continue to file for a license under the existing procedures, and some applicants will not meet the eligibility criteria for streamlined processing. Applicants may file electronic or paper applications. 28th We believe so that many small entities below the five percent (5%) ownership criteria may decide not to be cable landing license applicants, and THEREFORE, seeking entities will not be subject to the reporting, recordkeeping, or compliance requirements applicable to licensees. Small entities did reward licensees, and meet thesis criteria, may file application for Requesting thatthey can be removed from the license. The application would demonstrate did the entity: (1) Does not own or control a U.S. cable landing station, and (2) holds less than five percent (5%) interest in the cable System. The application would be filed with the Commission and copies would be served on each other licensee of the cable System. This burden Should Because The information would be minimally be Readily available from the Provided information did the entity at the time of becoming at initial Applicant or from other business records showing or to increase enlarge decrease of ownership interest. As to existing licensee of a cable landing license, the entity would have ready access to the names and addresses of other licensees. Malthus, the service burden would thus be minimal. 29th The Order thus Adopts standard competitive safeguards thatwill impose additional reporting burdens on Certain entities. We believe, HOWEVER, did very few small entities will be burdened with this requirement. Reporting requirements will be imposed only on Those applicants did have an affiliation with a carrier with market power in any of the cable's destination markets. These applicants will be required to Provide provisioning and maintenance reports did include: (A) Identification of each facility or service provisioned and / or maintained, (b) for provisioned facilities and services, the volume or quantity provisioned and the order-to-delivery intervals, and (c) for each facility and service, the number of outages and intervals to restoration. So, applicants will be required to Provide quarterly circuit status reports, on a facility-specific basis, in the format set out by the Commission's annual circuit status manual. If applicants have a concern over the public disclosure of Their reports, They may seek confidential treatment of the information and request a standard protective order. 30th The Order therefore did Adopts a rule requires licensees to notify the Commission of new affiliations thatthey can acquire with foreign carriers in a cable's destination market. If the Commission Deems it Necessary, it wants to impose on the licensee the newly affiliated Discussed above reporting requirements. This rule is similar to the notification rule did Applies in the context of international section 214 carriers, see 47 CFR 63.11. We believe this reporting requirement will have minimal applicability to small entities Because it wants to apply only to licensees, and it is likely, under our rules, did few small entities (that is, those independently owned and operated companies with no more than 1500 employees) will be required to become licensees. 31, The Order also adopts a new process designed to remove prior Commission review of pro forma assignments or transfers of control of interests in submarine cable landing licenses. Again, this process will have minimal applicability to small entities to the extent they are not cable licensees. Pro forma transactions do not result in a change in the ultimate control of the interest in the cable landing license or in changes to the cable system itself as previously evaluated at the time of the initial license application. Under the Order, a pro forma assignee or a person or company that is the subject of a pro forma transfer of control of an interest in a cable landing license will no longer be required to seek prior approval, but if electing post- transaction notification, must: (1) Notify the Commission no later than thirty (30) days after the pro forma transaction is consummated; (2) certify that the assignment or transfer of control is pro forma, and together with all previous pro forma transactions, does not result in a change of the licensee's ultimate control; and (3) provide an update to any ownership information required by our rules. Under this new rule, the burden of seeking prior approval would be eliminated for most entities, thus allowing them to proceed with their pro forma transaction without delay. Entities would file the same information after the transaction instead of prior to the transaction. The Order provides that [[Page 1619]] existing licenses could be modified, at a licensee's request, to be subject to this post-transaction process. The licensee would be required to file an application with the Commission seeking a modification of its license to incorporate this limited exception to the prior approval requirement currently set forth in the applicable license condition. This new process will impose a slight burden on applicants that have been granted a cable landing license and wish to take advantage of this new process. Presumably licensees will only subject themselves to this burden if they believe the benefit of expedited post-transaction processing of pro forma assignments or transfers of control will offset any burden. Similarly, the Order states that licensees of previously authorized cables may file applications to modify their licenses to substitute the new, more narrowly tailored ``no special concessions'' rule for the ``no exclusive arrangements'' condition contained in existing licenses. E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered 32nd The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach, which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1) The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to small entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance reporting requirements under the rule for small entities; (3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an exemption from coverage or the rule, or any part thereof, for small entities. 33rd In the NPRM, we requested comment on whether small entities would be adversely affected by the proposals and whether the proposals would enable small entities to respond to the demands of the market with minimum regulatory oversight, delays, and expenses. Commenters did not specifically address the impact on small entities. Rather, commenters expressed concerns that the NPRM proposals could be burdensome and time-consuming on all entities. Commenters proposed alternative measures more aligned with the existing section 214 streamlining procedures. As a result, the Order adopts measures that are closely modeled on the streamlining process for international section 214 authorizations which has been successful and not burdensome. 34th The procedures adopted in the Order are designed to provide more certainty and flexibility for applicants, encourage investment and infrastructure development by multiple providers, expand available submarine cable capacity, and decrease application processing time. This decision extends the benefits of streamlined processing to as many applicants as possible, including small entities. It reduces the regulatory and procedural burdens while preserving the Commission's ability to guard against anti-competitive behavior. This streamlined processing may benefit small entities especially because the procedures should facilitate entry by such entities into the submarine cable market and expand international services available to such entities. In addition, we have developed a definition of ``licensee'' that should permit a large number of small entities to be exempt from the requirements contained in the Order. 35th Finally, the reporting requirements and other measures adopted in the Order will minimize any economic impact on small entities. The reporting requirements, which apply only to certain licensees, will allow the Commission to monitor and detect anti-competitive behavior without imposing unnecessarily burdensome regulations on a US licensee due to its affiliation with a foreign carrier. 36th To simplify compliance with the rules and requirements, the Order codifies the submarine cable landing license conditions. This step will provide clear and publicly available standard conditions for all entities. Also, applicants will no longer be required to submit a letter affirmatively accepting the terms and conditions of the cable landing license. Report to Congress: The Commission will send a copy of the Order, including this FRFA, in a report to be sent to Congress pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 USC 801(a)(1)(A). In addition, the Commission will send a copy of the Order, including FRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A copy of the Order and FRFA (or summaries thereof) will also be published in the Federal Register. See 5 USC 604(b). Ordering Clauses 37th Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 201-255 303(r) of the Communications Act as amended, 47 USC 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-255, 303(r), and the Cable Landing License Act, 47 USC 34-39 and Executive Order No. 10530, Sec. 5(a), reprinted as amended in 3 USC 301, this Report and Order is hereby adopted and the Commission's rules, 47 CFR part 1, are amended as set forth in the Rule Changes. 38th It is further ordered that the policies, rules and requirements established in this decision shall take effect March 15, 2002, except for Secs. 1.767(a)(7) through (a)(9), (a)(11), (g)(1) through (g)(14), (j), (k), (l)(1) and (l)(2), and (m)(1) through (m)(2); and Secs. 1.768(a) through (i) which contain information collection requirements that have not been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The FCC will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date for those sections. 39th It is further ordered that the Commission's Consumer Information Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of this Report and Order, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 1 Communications common carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Telecommunications miscellaneous rules relating to common carriers. Federal Communications Commission. William F. Caton, Deputy Secretary. Rule Changes For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 1 as follows: PART 1--PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 1 The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 USC 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 225, 303(r), 309 and 325(e). 2 Section 1.767 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(5), (a)(7), and (a)(8); redesignating paragraph (a)(9) as (a)(10); adding new paragraphs (a)(9), (a)(11), (g) through (m) to read as follows: Sec. 1.767 Cable landing licenses. (a) * * * (5) A specific description of the cable landing stations on the shore of the United States and in foreign countries where the cable will land. The description shall include a map showing specific geographic coordinates, and may also include street addresses, of each landing station. The map must also specify the coordinates of any beach joint where those [[Page 1620]] coordinates differ from the coordinates of the cable station. The applicant initially may file a general geographic description of the landing points; however, grant of the application will be conditioned on the Commission's final approval of a more specific description of the landing points, including all information required by this paragraph, to be filed by the applicant no later than ninety (90) days prior to construction. The Commission will give public notice of the filing of this description, and grant of the license will be considered final if the Commission does not notify the applicant otherwise in writing no later than sixty (60) days after receipt of the specific description of the landing points, unless the Commission designates a different time period; ***** (7) A list of the proposed owners of the cable system, including each US cable landing station, their respective voting and ownership interests in each US cable landing station, their respective voting interests in the wet link portion of the cable system, and their respective ownership interests by segment in the cable; (8) For each applicant of the cable system, a certification as to whether the applicant is, or is affiliated with, a foreign carrier, including an entity that owns or controls a foreign cable landing station in any of the cable's destination markets. Include the citizenship of each applicant and information and certifications required in Sec. 63.18(h) through (k), and in Sec. 63.18(o), of this chapter; (9) A certification that the applicant accepts and will abide by the routine conditions specified in paragraph (g) of this section; and ***** (11) (i) If applying for authority to assign or transfer control of an interest in a cable system, the applicant shall complete paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section for both the transferor/assignor and the transferee/assignee. Only the transferee/assignee needs to complete paragraphs (a)(8) through (a)(9) of this section. At the beginning of the application, the applicant should also include a narrative of the means by which the transfer or assignment will take place. The application shall also specify, on a segment specific basis, the percentage of voting and ownership interests being transferred or assigned in the cable system, including in a US cable landing station. The Commission reserves the right to request additional information as to the particulars of the transaction to aid it in making its public interest determination. (ii) In the event the transaction requiring an assignment or transfer of control application also requires the filing of a foreign carrier affiliation notification pursuant to Sec. 1.768, the applicant shall reference in the application the foreign carrier affiliation notification and the date of its filing. See Sec. 1.768. See also paragraph (g)(7) of this section (providing for post-transaction notification of pro forma assignments and transfers of control). (iii) An assignee or transferee shall notify the Commission no later than thirty (30) days after either consummation of the assignment or transfer or a decision not to consummate the assignment or transfer. The notification may be by letter and shall identify the file numbers under which the initial license and the authorization of the assignment or transfer were granted. ***** (g) Routine conditions. Except as otherwise ordered by the Commission, the following rules apply to each licensee of a cable landing license granted on or after March 15, 2002: (1) Grant of the cable landing license is subject to: (i) All rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission; (ii) Any treaties or conventions relating to communications to which the United States is or may hereafter become a party; and (iii) Any action by the Commission or the Congress of the United States rescinding, changing, modifying or amending any rights accruing to any person by grant of the license; (2) The location of the cable system within the territorial waters of the United States of America, its territories and possessions, and upon its shores shall be in conformity with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army. The cable shall be moved or shifted by the licensee at its expense upon request of the Secretary of the Army, whenever he or she considers such course necessary in the public interest, for reasons of national defense, or for the maintenance and improvement of harbors for navigational purposes; (3) The licensee shall at all times comply with any requirements of United States government authorities regarding the location and concealment of the cable facilities, buildings, and apparatus for the purpose of protecting and safeguarding the cables from injury or destruction by enemies of the United States of America; (4) The licensee, or any person or company controlling it, controlled by it, or under direct or indirect common control with it, does not enjoy and shall not acquire any right to handle traffic to or from the United States, its territories or its possessions unless such service is authorized by the Commission pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act, as amended; (5)(i) The licensee shall be prohibited from agreeing to accept special concessions directly or indirectly from any foreign carrier, including any entity that owns or controls a foreign cable landing station, where the foreign carrier possesses sufficient market power on the foreign end of the route to affect competition adversely in the US market, and from agreeing to accept special concessions in the future. (ii) For purposes of this section, a special concession is defined as an exclusive arrangement involving services, facilities, or functions on the foreign end of a US international route that are necessary to land, connect, or operate submarine cables, where the arrangement is not offered to similarly situated US submarine cable owners, indefeasible-right-of-user holders, or lessors, and includes arrangements for the terms for acquisition, resale, lease, transfer and use of capacity on the cable; access to collocation space; the opportunity to provide or obtain backhaul capacity; access to technical network information; and interconnection to the public switched telecommunications network. Note to paragraph (g)(5): Licensees may rely on the Commission's list of foreign carriers that do not qualify for the presumption that they lack market power in particular foreign points for purposes of determining which foreign carriers are the subject of the requirements of this section. The Commission's list of foreign carriers that do not qualify for the presumption that they lack market power is available from the International Bureau's World Wide Web site at . (6) Except as provided in paragraph (g)(7) of this section, the cable landing license and rights granted in the license shall not be transferred, assigned, or disposed of, or disposed of indirectly by transfer of control of the licensee, unless the Federal Communications Commission gives prior consent in writing; (7) A pro forma assignee or a person or company that is the subject of a pro forma transfer of control of a cable landing license is not required to seek prior approval for the pro forma transaction. A pro forma assignee or person or company that is the subject of a pro forma transfer of control must notify the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, [[Page 1621]] Washington, DC 20554, with a copy to the Chief, International Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, no later than thirty (30) days after the assignment or transfer of control is consummated. The notification may be in the form of a letter (in duplicate to the Secretary), and it must contain a certification that the assignment or transfer of control was pro forma, as defined in Sec. 63.24(a) of this chapter, and, together with all previous pro forma transactions, does not result in a change of the licensee's ultimate control. A single letter may be filed for an assignment or transfer of control of more than one license issued in the name of a licensee if each license is identified by the file number under which it was granted; (8) Unless the licensee has notified the Commission in the application of the precise locations at which the cable will land, as required by paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the licensee shall notify the Commission no later than ninety (90) days prior to commencing construction at that landing location. The Commission will give public notice of the filing of each description, and grant of the cable landing license will be considered final with respect to that landing location unless the Commission issues a notice to the contrary no later than sixty (60) days after receipt of the specific description. Lake paragraph (a)(5) of this section; (9) The Commission reserves the right to require the licensee to file an environmental assessment should it determine that the landing of the cable at the specific locations and construction of necessary cable landing stations may significantly affect the environment within the meaning of Sec. 1.1307 implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. See Sec. 1.1307(a) and (b). The cable landing license is subject to modification by the Commission under its review of any environmental assessment or environmental impact statement that it may require pursuant to its rules. See also Sec. 1.1306 note 1 and Sec. 1.1307(c) and (d); (10) The Commission reserves the right, pursuant to section 2 of the Cable Landing License Act, 47 USC 35, Executive Order No. 10530 as amended, and section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 USC 214, to impose common carrier regulation or other regulation consistent with the Cable Landing License Act on the operations of the cable system if it finds that the public interest so requires; (11) The licensee, or in the case of multiple licensees, the licensees collectively, shall maintain de jure and de facto control of the US portion of the cable system, including the cable landing stations in the United States, sufficient to comply with the requirements of the Commission's rules and any specific conditions of the license; (12) The licensee shall comply with the requirements of Sec. 1.768; (13) The cable landing license is revocable by the Commission after due notice and opportunity for hearing pursuant to section 2 of the Cable Landing License Act, 47 USC 35, or for failure to comply with the terms of the license or with the Commission's rules; and (14) The licensee shall notify the Secretary, Federal Commissions Commission, Washington, DC 20554, in writing, within thirty (30) days of the date the cable is placed into service, of the date the cable was placed into service. The cable landing license shall expire twenty-five (25) years from the in-service date, unless renewed or extended upon proper application. Upon expiration, all rights granted under the license shall be terminated. (h) Applicants/Licensees. Except as otherwise required by the Commission, the following entities, at a minimum, shall be applicants for, and licensees on, a cable landing license: (1) Any entity that owns or controls a cable landing station in the United States; and (2) All other entities owning or controlling a five percent (5%) or greater interest in the cable system and using the US points of the cable system. (i) Processing of cable landing license applications. The Commission will take action upon an application eligible for streamlined processing, as specified in paragraph (k) of this section, within forty-five (45) days after release of the public notice announcing the application as acceptable for filing and eligible for streamlined processing. If the Commission deems an application seeking streamlined processing acceptable for filing but ineligible for streamlined processing, or if an applicant does not seek streamlined processing, the Commission will issue public notice indicating that the application is ineligible for streamlined processing. Within ninety (90) days of the public notice, the Commission will take action upon the application or provide public notice that, because the application raises questions of extraordinary complexity, an additional 90-day period for review is needed. Each successive 90-day period may be so extended. (j) Applications for streamlining. Each applicant seeking to use the streamlined grant procedure specified in paragraph (i) of this section shall caption its application and any cover letter with ``Application for Cable Landing License--Streamlined Processing Requested.'' Applications for streamlined processing shall include the information and certifications required by paragraph (k) of this section. On the date of filing with the Commission, the applicant shall also send a complete copy of the application, or any major amendments or other material filings regarding the application, to: US Coordinator, EB/CIP, US Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW, Washington, DC 20520-5818; Office of Chief Counsel/NTIA, US Department of Commerce, 14th St. and Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230; and Defense Information Systems Agency, Code RGC, 701 S. Courthouse Road, Arlington, Va. 22204, and shall certify such service on a service list attached to the application or other filing. (k) Eligibility for streamlining. Each applicant must demonstrate eligibility for streamlining by: (1) Certifying that it is not a foreign carrier and it is not affiliated with a foreign carrier in any of the cable's destination markets; (2) Demonstrating pursuant to Sec. 63.12(c)(l)(i) through (iii) of this chapter that any such foreign carrier or affiliated foreign carrier lacks market power; or (3) Certifying that the destination market where the applicant is, or has an affiliation with, a foreign carrier is a World Trade Organization (WTO) Member and the applicant agrees to accept and abide by the reporting requirements set out in paragraph (l) of this section. An application that includes an applicant that is, or is affiliated with, a carrier with market power in a cable's non-WTO Member destination country is not eligible for streamlining. (l) Reporting Requirements Applicable to Licensees Affiliated with a Carrier with Market Power in a Cable's WTO Destination Market. Any licensee that is, or is affiliated with, a carrier with market power in any of the cable's WTO Member destination countries, and that requests streamlined processing of an application under paragraphs (j) and (k) of this section, must comply with the following requirements: (1) File quarterly reports summarizing the provisioning and maintenance of all network facilities and services procured from the licensee's affiliate in that destination market, within ninety (90) days from the end of each calendar quarter. These reports shall contain the following: [[Page 1622]] (i) The types of facilities and services provided (for example, a lease of wet link capacity in the cable, collocation of licensee's equipment in the cable station with the ability to provide backhaul, or cable station and backhaul services provided to the licensee); (ii) For provisioned facilities and services, the volume or quantity provisioned, and the time interval between order and delivery; and (iii) The number of outages and intervals between fault report and facility or service restoration; and (2) File quarterly circuit status reports, within ninety (90) days from the end of each calendar quarter and in the format set out by the Sec. 43.82 of this chapter annual circuit status manual with the exception that activated or idle circuits must be reported on a facility-by-facility basis and derived circuits need not be specified. See Sec. 63.10(c)(5) of this chapter. (m) (1) Except as specified in paragraph (m)(2) of this section, amendments to pending applications, and applications to modify a license, including amendments or applications to add a new applicant or licensee, shall be signed by each initial applicant or licensee, calculated. Joint applicants or licensees may appoint one party to act as proxy for purposes of complying with this requirement. (2) Any licensee that seeks to relinquish its interest in a cable landing license shall file an application to modify the license. Search application must include a demonstration that the applicant is not required to be a licensee under paragraph (h) of this section and that the remaining licensee(s) will retain collectively de jure and de facto control of the US portion of the cable system sufficient to comply with the requirements of the Commission's rules and any specific conditions of the license, and must be served on each other licensee of the cable system. Note to Sec. 1.767: The terms ``affiliated'' and ``foreign carrier, '' as used in this section, are defined as in Sec. 63.09 of this chapter except that the term ``foreign carrier'' also shall include any entity that owns or controls a cable landing station in a foreign market. 3 Add Sec. 1.768 to read as follows: Sec. 1.768 Notification by and prior approval for submarine cable landing licensees that are or propose to become affiliated with a foreign carrier. Any entity that is licensed by the Commission (``licensee'') to land or operate a submarine cable landing in a particular foreign destination market that becomes, or seeks to become, affiliated with a foreign carrier that is authorized to operate in that market, including an entity that owns or controls a cable landing station in that market, shall notify the Commission of that affiliation. (a) Affiliations requiring prior notification: Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the licensee must notify the Commission, pursuant to this section, forty-five (45) days before consummation of either of the following types of transactions: (1) Acquisition by the licensee, or by any entity that controls the licensee, or by any entity that directly or indirectly owns more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the capital stock of the licensee, of a controlling interest in a foreign carrier that is authorized to operate in a market where the cable lands; or (2) Acquisition of a direct or indirect interest greater than twenty-five percent (25%), or of a controlling interest, in the capital stock of the licensee by a foreign carrier that is authorized to operate in a market where the cable lands, or by an entity that controls such a foreign carrier. (b) Exceptions: (1) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, the notification required by this section need not be filed before consummation, and may instead by filed pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, if either of the following is true with respect to the named foreign carrier, regardless of whether the destination market where the cable lands is a World Trade Organization (WTO) or non-WTO Member: (i) The Commission has previously determined in an adjudication that the foreign carrier lacks market power in that destination market (for example, in an international section 214 application or a declaratory ruling proceeding); or (ii) The foreign carrier owns no facilities in that destination market. For this purpose, a carrier is said to own facilities if it holds an ownership, indefeasible-right-of-user, or leasehold interest in a cable landing station or in bare capacity in international or domestic telecommunications facilities (excluding switches). (2) In the event paragraph (b)(1) of this section cannot be satisfied, notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, the notification required by this section need not be filed before consummation, and may instead be filed pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, if the licensee certifies that the destination market where the cable lands is a WTO Member and provides certification to satisfy either of the following: (i) The licensee demonstrates that its foreign carrier affiliate lacks market power in the cable's destination market pursuant to Sec. 63.10(a)(3) of this chapter (see Sec. 63.10(a)(3) of this chapter); or (ii) The licensee agrees to comply with the reporting requirements contained in Sec. 1.767(l) effective upon the acquisition of the affiliation. See Sec. 1.767(l). (c) Notification after consummation: Any licensee that becomes affiliated with a foreign carrier and has not previously notified the Commission pursuant to the requirements of this section shall notify the Commission within thirty (30) days after consummation of the acquisition. Example 1 to paragraph (c). Acquisition by a licensee (or by any entity that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under direct or indirect common control with the licensee) of a direct or indirect interest in a foreign carrier that is greater than twenty-five percent (25%) but not controlling is subject to paragraph (c) of this section but not to paragraph (a) of this section. Example 2 to paragraph (c). Notification of an acquisition by a licensee of a hundred percent (100%) interest in a foreign carrier may be made after consummation, pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, if the foreign carrier operates only as a resale carrier. Example 3 to paragraph (c). Notification of an acquisition by a foreign carrier from a WTO Member of a greater than twenty-five percent (25%) interest in the capital stock of the licensee may be made after consummation, pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, if the licensee demonstrates in the post-notification that the foreign carrier lacks market power in the cable's destination market or the licensee agrees to comply with the reporting requirements contained in Sec. 1.767(l) effective upon the acquisition of the affiliation. (d) Cross-reference: In the event a transaction requiring a foreign carrier notification pursuant to this section also requires a transfer of control or assignment application pursuant to the requirements of the license granted under Sec. 1.767 or Sec. 1.767(g), the foreign carrier notification shall reference in the notification the transfer of control or assignment application and the date of its filing. Lake Sec. 1.767(g). (e) Contents of notification: The notification shall certify the following information: (1) The name of the newly affiliated foreign carrier and the country or countries at the foreign end of the cable in which it is authorized to provide telecommunications services to the public or where it owns or controls a cable landing station; (2) Which, if any, of those countries is a Member of the World Trade Organization; (3) The name of the cable system that is the subject of the notification, and the [[Page 1623]] FCC file number(s) under which the license was granted; (4) The name, address, citizenship, and principal business of any person or entity that directly or indirectly owns at least ten percent (10%) of the equity of the licensee, and the percentage of equity owned by each of those entities (to the nearest one percent (1%)); (5) Interlocking directorates. The name of any interlocking directorates, as defined in Sec. 63.09(g) of this chapter, with each foreign carrier named in the notification. See Sec. 63.09(g) of this chapter. (6) With respect to each foreign carrier named in the notification, a statement as to whether the notification is subject to paragraph (a) or (c) of this section. In the case of a notification subject to paragraph (a) of this section, the licensee shall include the projected date of closing. In the case of a notification subject to paragraph (c) of this section, the licensee shall include the actual date of closing. (7) If a licensee relies on an exception in paragraph (b) of this section, then a certification as to which exception the foreign carrier satisfies and a citation to any adjudication upon which the licensee is relying. Licensees relying upon the exceptions in paragraph (b)(2) of this section must make the required certified demonstration in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section or the certified commitment to comply with the reporting requirements in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section in the notification required by paragraph (c) of this section. (f) If the licensee seeks to be excepted from the reporting requirements contained in Sec. 1.767(l), the licensee should demonstrate that each foreign carrier affiliate named in the notification lacks market power pursuant to Sec. 63.10(a)(3) of this chapter. See Sec. 63.10(a)(3) of this chapter. (g) Procedure. After the Commission issues a public notice of the submissions made under this section, interested parties may file comments within fourteen (14) days of the public notice. (1) If the Commission deems it necessary at any time before or after the deadline for submission of public comments, the Commission may impose reporting requirements on the licensee based on the provisions of Sec. 1.767(l). See Sec. 1.767(l). (2) In the case of a prior notification filed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section in which the foreign carrier is authorized to operate in, or own a cable landing station in, a non-WTO Member, the licensee must demonstrate that it continues to serve the public interest for it to retain its interest in the cable landing license for that segment of the cable that lands in the non-WTO destination market by demonstrating either that the foreign carrier lacks market power in that destination market pursuant to Sec. 63.10(a)(3) of this chapter or the market offers effective opportunities for US companies to land and operate a submarine cable in that country. If the licensee is unable to make either required showing or is notified that the affiliation may otherwise harm the public interest pursuant to the Commission's policies and rules under 47 USC 34 through 39 and Executive Order No. 10530, dated May 10, 1954, then the Commission may impose conditions necessary to address any public interest harms or may proceed to an immediate authorization revocation hearing. Note to paragraph (g)(2): The assessment of whether a destination market offers effective opportunities for US companies to land and operate a submarine cable will be made under the standard established in Rules and Policies on Foreign Participation in the US Telecommunications Market, Market Entry and Regulation of Foreign-Affiliated Entities, IB Docket Nos. 97-142 and 95-22, Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 12 FCC Rcd 23891, 23946 at paragraph 130, 62 FR 64741, December 9, 1997. (h) All licensees are responsible for the continuing accuracy of information provided pursuant to this section for a period of forty- five (45) days after filing. During this period if the information furnished is no longer accurate, the licensee shall as promptly as possible, and in any event within ten (10) days, unless good cause is shown, file with the Secretary in duplicate a corrected notification referencing the FCC file numbers under which the original notification was provided. (i) A licensee that files a prior notification pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may request confidential treatment of its filing, pursuant to Sec. 0.459 of this chapter, for the first twenty (20) days after filing. Such a request must be made prominently in a cover letter accompanying the filing. Note to Sec. 1.768: The terms ``affiliated'' and ``foreign carrier, '' as used in this section, are defined as in Sec. 63.09 of this chapter except that the term ``foreign carrier'' also shall include an entity that owns or controls a cable landing station in a foreign market. [FR Doc. 02-789 Filed 1-11-02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-10-P

Source: cryptome.org

You might also like:

Amada Curling - City Clerk of Passaic, NJ 2012
Amada Curling - City Clerk of Passaic, NJ 2012

Office Automation

Is just what it sounds. Those things which AUTOMATE jobs in the office. Your resume should show this using action verbs and show a history, wihtout being vague....
Produced reports for yearly meetings of employees at Annual Convention.
Utilized Microsoft Word to write documents for daily correspondence, memos and blah blah blah.
Proficient in LexisNexis as required to research case histories for reports.
Hope this helps.

Microsoft automation

Means using macros/visual basic to carry out tasks.
All MS Office products can run vba scripts, and you can also tell one program to command another program to do something.
For example, running vba code in Access that will:
1) Start Excel
2) Go through all the records in a table
3) Insert data into a spreadsheet
4) Format the spreadsheet columns, borders, fonts, colors

The Rise of Bullshit Jobs  — EconoMonitor
In other words, productive jobs have, just as predicted, been largely automated away… But rather than ..

County commission: Department heads lay out their budgets in workshops  — Branford News
Director of Libraries Betty Lawrence submitted a budget that included the need of a new automated computer system that would let her know when they are out of certain books and supplies among other things. Lawrence ..

Related posts:

  1. Office Automation Clerk Cover letter
  2. Office Automation Clerk resume
  3. Office Automation Clerk Jobs

  • Avatar Norin How to get work in NASA?
    Jan 13, 2007 by Norin | Posted in Financial Services
    • For all the diversity of NASA s workforce, the question, "How can I become an astronaut?" is very common. The answer depends on where you are now and where you want to go. If you haven t finished high school yet, former astronaut Dr. Sally K. Ride has these suggestions for you: "The most important steps that I followed were studying math and science in school. I was always interested in physics and astronomy and chemistry …

  • Avatar smarty I m in 11 grade from india and would like to know that how can i get into NASA?
    Jan 09, 2010 by smarty | Posted in Astronomy & Space
    • You have to be in the field of study who specialize in science, technology, engineering or mathematics. NASA civil service employees are responsible for conducting aerospace research and development, managing resources, and operating our NASA facilities. Working for NASA is truly a unique experience. Whether you are supporting the programs that enable us to visit the outer planets, or are the very scientists that make amazing discoveries, there …

  • Avatar miss friendly I m a Bi.P.C student.?
    Apr 14, 2007 by miss friendly | Posted in Higher Education (University +)

    I d like to know if there are any chances in NASA for students having biology as their main subject. i m just studying my inter[plus 1] if there are any id like to know the requirements like qualification ,working area and so on please give me a detailed information PLEASE DO HELP ME

    • Want to Work at NASA? NASA is more than astronauts. We are scientists, engineers, computer programmers, personnel specialists, accountants, writers, maintenance workers and many, many other kinds of people. At the NASAJobs Web site, you can review job listings, post a resume and even apply for a NASA job online. At NASAJobs students can find opportunities for internships, cooperative programs and summer employment. For all the diversity of NASA …